|
Ruling on
Songs by M.H. Fadlallah part (1)
|
In an Interview with Elaph, a Saudi Electronic
Newspaper, Sayyed Mohammad Hussein Fadlullah, stated that the
woman’s voice is not a “Awra” (something that should be veiled
having the same ruling as the parts of the body) and singing is
not prohibited.
The Religious Authority, Sayyed Mohammad Hussein
Fadlullah considers that “singing” is not a prohibited act in
case it does not harm in its contents the profound intellectual
and humane values and in case it is accompanied by a high-class
music. His Eminence also considers that the songs that glorify
the tyrants and the vicious regimes are prohibited like what is
happening in many Arab countries where some singers praise their
leaders because they are afraid of their tyranny or to flatter
them. In a special general interview with Elaph newspaper,
Sayyed Fadlullah gave the final word concerning the issue of the
woman's voice declaring that he does not consider it a "Awra"(something
that should be veiled having the same ruling as the parts of the
body). Moreover, he deemed it permissible for a woman to sing in
case the song's meanings are sublime, citing the experience of
the Iranian government as evidence, where the media broadcasts
songs. His Eminence draws a general line in prohibiting and
permitting songs: but, he leaves the chance to the listener to
classify the songs without mentioning names and details.
However, he prohibits the jazz music that destroys the nerves
and has negative effects on the listener.
It is prohibited to sing for the tyrants:
Q: Some may consider that discussing the issue
of singing from a religious point of view is superficial issue
since it does not even deserve to be raised in this context.
Knowing that the songs surround us every where, what is your
opinion concerning this issue?
A: In our opinion, the issue of singing depends
on the vibration and undulation of the voice and the way of
saying the words of the song, and this differs according to the
voice’s pitch. The melodious voice gives the word a profound
effect on the listener that may in its turn affect his
sentiments. So, if the words of the song are just, normally, its
melody will make the listener affected deeply by the meanings
and thus he may react positively with them.
On the contrary, if the words of the songs are of
negative meanings, they may drive man to do evil or prohibited
acts, to devastate or to be malicious. These meanings affect the
listener negatively because he is able to understand them. Thus,
through the effects of the song a person may be driven to do all
the matters latent in his mind.
Q: Generally speaking, in the Arab World there
are no songs that call for spreading the evil in frank
expressions like what is happening in the West...?!
A: In the Arab World, singing is directed
towards arousing the instincts. This kind of singing is
prohibited because it makes the person live sexual obsessions
due to the nature of the melody or the words of the song that
arouse the instincts. Besides, the songs in which the singers
glorify the tyrants and the vicious regimes or the evil states
are also prohibited.
Q: Some songs are classified in the category of
the patriotic songs although they glorify dictator leaders like
what is happening in some Arab countries. Are these songs deemed
permissible?
A: The patriotic songs that connect man with the
positive meaning of one’s country like defending the country,
keeping the freedom and independence and the like are absolutely
not prohibited. Hence, we consider that the songs that praise
the beauty of nature, the nostalgia towards one’s country or
family …etc, in addition to the songs that upraise the soul and
open the human horizons to Allah (The Exalted) and to all the
spiritual songs are not prohibited.
The platonic love songs are not prohibited
Q: Why it is not prohibited to sing the nature
and the sublime meanings, while, it is prohibited to sing love,
knowing that even love has sublime meanings?
A: There is a difference between love that has a
humane value and love in which man addresses the woman or the
woman addresses the man. The second kind of love arouses the
instincts, while, Islam does not want man’s instinct to be
aroused because this arousal would lead into negative and
immoral acts. On the other hand, the songs of love that have
spiritual significations are not prohibited. An important point
that we have to know in this
context is that singing may steal the person’s will since he
might be deeply stirred up by the song. Allah wants man to live
his will according to his choice because it is up to him to
direct his will either positively or negatively. But when he is
dominated by the emotional conditions, through the exciting
music that arouses his instincts unconsciously and drives him to
behave in an unacceptable manner, he will be deprived of his
right to choose.
Q: Is this also applied on the revolutionary
songs that sometimes create violent reactions?
A: There is a point that should be clarified. If
these songs represent the good deed for man, then, there is no
problem in listening to them because when man is encouraged the
results would be positive. But, the other aspects that make man
behave in a negative manner when he is exited are absolutely
rejected.
Q: So, is it a relative issue?
A: Yes, it is a relative issue even we prohibit
listening to Jazz music that destroys the nerves and makes man
live in a negative state that makes him behave involuntarily.
Q: Do you classify the songs according to their
effects on the individual?
A: We classify songs according to the kind of
their effect in general and not according to their effects on
each person. For example, wine may not intoxicate some people,
whereas, it is prohibited. Allah says:
{and avoid false words} (22:3o). There is an
interpretation that considers the false words as words that is
not righteous. Allah also says: {And those
who do not bear witness to what is valid} (25:72) that is
interpreted by singing. We also have another verse that is:
{But there are, among man, those who purchase idle tales,
without knowledge (or meaning), to mislead (men) from the Path
of Allah throw ridicule (on the Path)} (31:6). (Lahwa
Alhadith) or “the idle tales” are the words that deviate man
mentally, doctrinally, legitimately, etc... Hence, every thing
that is defined as Batil or misleading from Allah’s path is
deemed prohibited.
Singing in Iran is not prohibited
Q: There is a consensus among some critics and
some psychologists on some songs such as Fayrouz’s songs that
talk about love without arousing the instincts. Such songs
affect the listener positively and absolutely relax the nerves,
what is the ruling regarding these songs from a religious point
of view?
A: I have just answered this question and I did
not say that all songs that express love are prohibited. I said
that the prohibited songs are that which arouse the instincts.
For example, we accept the paternal and maternal expressions as
well as the platonic love of man towards a woman that elevates
the soul and represent a spiritual and human value and not an
instinctive value. Now, when we study the experience that the
adolescents live when listening to the common songs, we find
that this experience creates a kind of an unconscious and
instinctive attraction towards the singer.