|
infallibles >Imam Al-Hussein's March:The means and the goals(Part I)
|
|
Imam Al-Hussein's March:
The means and the goals (Part I) |
When we want to study the march of Imam Hussein (a.s.), we have to
take it as a whole. We have to study it, he made peace as well as when he
make war. In both cases, he was a revolutionary. To engage in a
revolution does not mean only fighting in a direct way. You might fight
with when you hold your sword in your hand, as well as when it is on your
side. In many cases, you might fight by preparing the circumstances, and
the base that could face the challenges. Such a war might be more
effective in the beginning than resorting to arms.
A war by means of peace :
How did Imam Hussein start his war through Imam Hassan's peace. They
both made a truce with Muawiyah, because the army was exhausted, and the
people were unaware of the real picture, as a result of the wars from the
beginning of Ali's caliphate until his martyrdom, which veiled the
deviated rule of the Umayyad rule.
People lacked a clear vision. Wars usually make people preoccupied
with what is going on-especially when one of the parties is victorious.
Moreover, the fighters were tried and they were not enthusiastic to go to
war. The tribal leaders benefited from this exhaustion and were able to
convert it to benefit its own interests. The war in these circumstances
represented a loss for the cause and not only for the person.
Imam Al- Hassan wanted to give the people a chance to experience the
rule of the Umayyads, and learn how deviated they were. The revolution
would then be a natural reaction that people will reach as a result of
their own experience.
And this what happened, and people began to learn the type of class
discrimination, partisanship and fanaticism the Umayyad rule represented,
especially how they used to employ their own people and leave the others
no matter how qualified they were.
Then in the end, Muawiyah who promised Imam Al-Hassan to be the caliph
after him, conspired and poisoned the Imam(a.s.). When the Imam (a.s.)
was martyred, Muawiyah wanted to force the people to pledge loyalty to
his son, Yazid. A man stood carrying bags of money in one hand and a
sword in the other had saying: Who pledges the loyalty will have this
(pointing to the money) and who refuses will have that (pointing to this
sword).
Such tyranny aggravated, and the honourable companion, Hujr bin Udai
was killed along, with his son and some of his followers, because he
refused to renounce Imam Ali.
This killing was met with the protest of Aisha, the mother of
believers, since the killing of Hujr was a terrorist act, for he was
known for his piety.
Then, cursing Imam Ali was passed as a law in all Friday prayers and
Eids and in all parts of the Islamic state.
Favourable conditions:
This rule of tyranny aggravated until people could no longer tolerate
it, and revolution became a natural reaction that everybody was talking
about.
Then, the whole situation was further aggravated, when Muawiyah asked
the people to pledge their loyalty to his son, Yazid.
He stood up in a decisive stand that gave the issue its significant
size and said: we are the family of prophethood whom the Quran was
revealed to, while Yazid is a dissolute man who drinks wine and kills
innocent people despite Allah's prohibition. And ended by saying: A man
like me does not pledge loyalty to a man like him.
Revolution on Tyranny
Thus, Imam Hussein declared his opposition to the tyrant rule. Then he
started to prepare the psychological atmosphere for leaving Al-Medina. He
chose to leave the people before the ninth of Zil-Hijja while the
pilgrims were on their way to Mina. He transformed his Hajj into an Umra
and left the people who were waiting for the Imam to be with them on the
Mount of Arafa. The people were heading for Mina while he was heading for
Iraq.
Why did the Imam take such a step?
He wanted the people to wonder about why he did not leave straight to
Iraq from Makkah, but left the day the people were getting ready to stand
at Arafah, to initiate a revolution against Yazid and the Umayyad rule.
He also left in an interesting way. Usually a rebel would not take
with him his family and children and those of his, but the Imam did just
that to create a feeling of protest in the eyes of everyone who saw the
convoy making the people feel that even the Imam's family and children
were threatened by the tyrant ruler, and that it would not be safe to
leave them in Medina, the continuation of the revolution after his Martyrdom.
|