|
The First Sermon
In
the Name of God, the Compassionate, the Merciful
The
Shining face of Islam
Allay says in His
Glorious Book: :{Allah’s wish is but to remove uncleanness far
from you, O folk of the Household, and cleanse you with a though
cleansing} (33:33).
One of those Imams
whose death anniversary was on the seventeenth of Safar is Imam Ali
bin Musa Al-Rida (a.s.).
This Imam was the most
knowledgeable scholar of his age. He was also the most ethical and
the most respectful to all those whom he talked with. Whenever he
used to talk to anyone, even his enemies, he was never heard saying
any harsh words even when he was cursed.
He also needs to go to
the Prophet’s Mosque while all the top scholars used to meet and
answer the people’s questions. When they could not answer a
question they used to refer it to him. Thus, he was regarded as the
supreme authority even by those who did not recognize his Imamate.
Al-Ma’moun, the
caliph who used to be an accomplished scholar unlike those who came
before or after him, made the Imam discuss philosophical and
theological issues of religion with a group of intellectuals
representing all schools of thought including Christians, Jews,
Zaradustran …etc and the Imam was able to overcome all of them.
Thus, the Imam used to
be regarded by all Muslims of all sects as the authority in matters
of religion and thought.
In this respect, there
is a fact about Ahl-el Beit, I want you to beware of: They are not
simply people who use their intellectual and religious tools to
reach certain rulings, and consequently they could be either right
or wrong. They are infallible.
The
Infallibles
As Shiites, we believe
that the Imams are infallible… Their sayings are those of the
Messenger. Imam Ali said: “The Messenger has taught me one
thousands fields of knowledge and in each field one thousand gates
(branches) were opened before me” to enable him to address all
what people need.
Imam Al-Sadiq also
says: “My sayings are those of my father’s (They are not
independent judgments) and my father’s are those of my
grandfather’s and theirs are those of Hussein, while the sayings
of Hussein are those of Ali, and the sayings of Ali are those of the
Messenger. The sayings of the Messenger are those of God”.
Thus, we believe that
the imamate is a continuation of the movement of the Prophet’s
Message. The Imams are not religious scholars who try to understand
the Message and explain it; they convey what the Messenger has said.
Thus, our sect is not simply one of the Islamic sects it is a
continuation of the Message.
For we believe in the
infallibility of the Imam, despite what certain Sheiks might say,
May Allah guide them.
The
Imam’s Era
Imam Rida lived in a
decisive era that was full of events.
When Al-Ma’moun was
victorious, over his brother in their struggle over power, he called
on Imam Al-Rida to become the caliph or at least agree to become his
heir. Although historians differ in the reasons that motivated Al-Ma’moun,
and whether he pressurized the Imam to accept his offer, as he acted
as a crown-price, the Imam was able to present a lot of services to
the Islamic culture and to the ethic of Islam as well as trying to
relief the poor and address their pains and sorrows.
Historians also differ
in how the Imam died. Some say that Al-Ma’moun poisoned him after
he reconciled with his family. In any case, when we remember Imam
Al-Rida who filled the Islamic world with knowledge, spirituality
and morality, we have to review some of his sayings. We should
imagine that if his body is away, he is still with us through these
sayings.
The
Imam’s teachings
In one of his letters
to Sayyed Abdilazim al-Hassani, one of the great Shiite scholars who
used to follow the school of Ahl el-Beit, the Imam says: “Give my
best whishes to my followers, and tell them not to enable Satan to
find his way to them. Do not let him seduce you to obey him in what
makes you disobey God. And tell them to be truthful in what they
say, and to return what they are entrusted with to its owners, and
do not involve in debates in what does not concern them. Tell them
also to be close to one another and exchange visits.
They ought to visit one
another and not go and pay a visit to the Imam’s shrine while
fighting one another. He added: They should not be concerned in
breaking up one another.”
Those who do so, the
Imam has asked God to punish them in this world and in the
Hereafter…
He ends by saying:
“Let them know that Allah has rewarded those who had done good
deeds among them, and forgiven those who sinned, except those who
assumed partners to God or hurt one of Allah’s followers… If
they do so, Allah will not forgive them until they cease to do so.
This is the Imam’s will to the believers who follow the line of
Ahl el-Beit to unite and refer their differences, if they differ, to
Allah and His Messenger.
Yet we do not live in a
society that is governed by such teachings.
We live in mutual
hatred, even on the basic of religious fanaticism that manipulates
religion to serve partisan causes.
We have enough enemies
as it is, but we are more dangerous on one another than our enemies.
We have turned into sects and parties that live on hatred and
fanaticism, even to religious authorities. We produce every single
day a new sect that feeds on hatred and fanaticism.
Yet, we travel to visit
the Imam’s shrines. If this the way you intend to maintain, save
your money and pay your tribute to Imam Al-Rida from where you live.
It is far more important to act according to his teaching, which we
will talk more about in the future.
We ask God, to make us
of those who follow Imam Al-Rida and the other Imams. We ask him to
make us soldiers in the army of his grandson who will fill the earth
with Justice, the major theme we all seek to establish. But it is a
principle that should be followed in all aspects of life whether
with God, with oneself, with his own family, or with the other
people.
The
Second Sermon
In
the Name of God, the Compassionate, the Merciful
Massacres
in Palestine and Iraq are committed by the same enemy
The bloody scene in
Palestine of Barbaric Israeli massacres against the Palestinian
civilians including children, women and the elderly is being
repeated by the American brutal massacres in Iraq… Moreover, if
the Palestinians are fighting in Palestine as a reaction to the
occupation and its crimes, the Iraqi people too are fighting in this
latest episode as a reaction to the occupation and its atrocities.
Furthermore, the
collective punishments of the villages, cities and camps by bombing
Palestinian civilians to retaliate for detaining one person or
killing one soldier, are also being practiced by the American f-16
fighters in Iraq whether in Najaf, Baghdad or Faluja... The siege
forced on 500 thousand civilians in Faluja is similar to the siege
imposed on all the Palestinian people.
If the Americans are
talking about liberating Iraq and establishing democracy and freedom
there, we ask them if this is the way to convince the Iraqis in the
American brand of democracy! Do excessive force and indiscriminating
bombing make the Iraqis love America and support its policies?
Would not it lead the
Iraqis and the rest of Arabs and Muslims to hate America even more?
We notice that there
are two countries in the world that do not allow to try their
soldiers for the crimes that they might commit against civilians:
Those countries are America and Israel.
We also know that
America punished some of the countries that had voted in favor of
trying them, and it also protects its ally of any similar trials.
Thus, these two
countries do not have anything to be afraid of on the international
level when they commit their atrocities.
We believe that before
America could talk about serving justice in Iraq, it should present
itself to justice to be tried for its crimes in this country… If
it had thrown the totalitarian regime to promote its own interests,
this is a thing that belongs to the past. The question is what about
the present and the future?
Does America want to
increase the collective massacres, as it did in the past when it
encouraged its agent, Saddam, to crush the popular Intifada in
Shaaban.
It is true that there
have been some complications in Iraq, but they could not be treated
by this American brutal way.
The American political
stupidity have embarrassed even those who collaborate with them
leading to their confusion and issuing ambiguous and cloudy stands,
with the exception of certain non-Arab Iraqis who described the
opposition as “Murders and terrorists”, being motivated by their
national inspirations that unfortunately interact with the American
strategy.
No to
violence against civilians
On the other hands,
just as we condemned the American management of the latest
development, we emphasize our strong rejection to the violence that
targets Iraqi civilians in their mosques and Holy places as well as
their humanitarian institutions. Such violence whoever commits it
and regardless of their motives, could not be given the honor of
being called resistance. They are rather criminal and terrorist
acts.
No to
sectarian strife
Thus, we denounce the
communiqué issued by Al-Zarkawi: especially that he did not deny
it. It calls for committing aggressions against Shiite leaders and
Imams. All Iraqis especially Sunni clerics should voice their
condemnation of this sectarian mentality that executes the arrogant
plot of creating strife among Muslims.
We also condemn others
attempts to create sectarian strife, such as the books and tapes
distributed in Kuwait, and call upon our brothers, there, to stand
united as Kuwaitis and as Muslims.
A test
for all parties
In this atmosphere of
chaos, we warn against those who are trying to create trouble even
by creating a new massacre in Karbala like the one that was
committed on the tenth of Muharram, and we call for extreme
vigilance… We also call upon all parties to respect the lives and
properties of all citizens, and prevent the thieves and criminals
from destabilizing the general order, for anarchy benefits the
occupation only. We also urge the faithful and honest Iraqi
politicians to stand with their people and not with the occupiers,
since the current stage represents a test to them.
As for the Arab and
Muslims regimes’ total silence in the face of the American
massacres, just as the heavy silence they face the Israeli massacres
with, we ask: What Arab summit are they talking about: The last
summit was post power due to an American suggestion and the coming
summit will be held due to another American suggestion since what
the Americans want to change has been changed.
Lebanon:
They simply refuse to leave
Lebanon is living a
crisis of many levels sectarians incitation, economic depression,
rise of the national debt to reach twice of the local product,
increase in taxes of which 90% go to some of the rich who are
provided by 3 billions every year from the pier.
Yet the political class
engages in its feuds that end any stability or viability the country
possess, and continues to follow its course of corruption and theft.
They are simply unable to solve any problem yet they refuse to leave
and try to distract the people with sectarian differences that make
them forget their hunger. When will all this end?
|